Thursday, September 8, 2016
Synchronized 4kva Stackable Inverter Circuit Part 1
Synchronized 4kva Stackable Inverter Circuit Part 1
This first part of the proposed 4kva synchronized stackable inverter circuit discusses how to implement the crucial automatic synchronization across the 4 inverters with regards to frequency, phase and voltage to keep the inverters running independent of each other yet achieving an output thats on par with each other.
The idea was requested by Mr. David. The following email conversation between him and me details the main specs of the proposed Synchronized 4kva Stackable Inverter Circuit.
Email#1
Hi Swagatam,
Firstly I wanted to say thank you for your contribution to the world at large, the information and most importantly your willingness to share your knowledge to help other people in my opinion is invaluable for many reasons.
I would like to enhance some of the circuits you have shared to suit my own purposes, unfortunately whilst I understand what is going on in the circuits I lack the creativity and knowledge to make the amendments myself.
I can generally follow circuits if they are small and I can see where they join/connect into bigger schematics. If I may I would like to try to explain what I would like to achieve, though I am under no illusion that you are a very busy person and would not like take up your precious time unnecessarily.
The final goal would be that I would like to build ( assemble the components ) of a multi-source renewable energy micro grid, using Solar PV, Windmills, and bio diesel generators.
The first step is the PV solar inverter enhancements. I would like to use your 48 volt pure sine wave inverter circuit capable of maintaining a constant 2kW 230V output, it must be capable of delivering at least 3 times this output for a very short duration.
The key modification that I want to achieve it to create a number of these inverters units to work in parallel and connected to an AC bus bar. I would like each inverter to independently and constantly sample the AC bus bar for frequency, voltage and current (load).
I will call these inverters slave units. The idea being the invert modules will be “plug and play”.
The inverter once connected to the AC bus bar would constantly sample/measure the frequency on the AC bus bar and use this information to drive the input of a 4047 IC such that its clock output can be advanced or retarded until it exactly clones the frequency on the AC bus bar once the two wave forms are synchronized the inverter will close a contactor or relay which connects the invert output stage to the AC bus bar.
In the event that the frequency on the bar or the voltage moves outside of a pre-determined tolerance the inverter module should open the relay or contactor on the output stage effectively disconnecting the inverter output stage from the AC bar to protect its self.
Additionally once connected to the AC bus bar the slave units would go to sleep or at least the output stage of the inverter would sleep while the load on the bar is less than the sum of all of the slave inverters. Imagine if you will there are 3 slave inverters attached to the AC bus bar, however the load on the bar is only 1.8kW then the other two slaves would go to sleep.
The reciprocal would also be true that if the load on the bar jumped to say 3kW one of the sleeping inverts would instantly wake (already be in sync) to supply the additionally required energy.
I imagine some large capacitors on each of the output stage would supply the energy required whilst the inverter has the very short moment whilst it wakes up. It would be preferable (only in my opinion) not to directly connect each inverter to each other but rather that they be independently autonomous.
I want to try to avoid micro controllers or the units error or fault checking each other or the units having ‘address’s’ on the system. In my mind’s eye I imagine that the first connected device on the AC bus bar would be a very stable reference inverter that is constantly connected.
This reference inverter would provide the frequency and voltage that the other slave units would use to generate their own respective outputs.
Unfortunately I can’t get my head around how you could prevent a feedback loop where the slave units would each potentially end up becoming the reference unit. Beyond the scope of this email I have some small generators I would like to connect to the AC bus bar synchronizing to the reference inverter to supply energy in the event that the load exceeds the DC max output capacity.
The overall premise is that the load presented to the AC bus bar would determine how many inverters and ultimately how many generators would either autonomously connect or disconnect to meet the demand as this would hopefully save energy or at least not waste energy.
The system being completely built of multiple modules would then be expandable/contractible as well as robust/resilient such that if anyone or perhaps two units were to fail the system would continue to function all be it at reduced capacity. I have attached a block diagram and excluded the battery charging for the time being.
I plan on charging the battery bank from the AC bus and rectifying down to 48V DC this way I can charge from the generators or the renewable energy sources, I do recognize that this is perhaps not as efficient as using DC mppt but I think what I lose in efficiency I gain in flexibility. I live a long way from town or the utility grid.
For reference there would be a minimum constant load on the AC bus bar of 2kW’s though the peak load could rise by as much as 30kW.
My plan is for the 1st 10 to 15kW to be provided by the solar PV panels and two 3kW (peak) windmills the windmills are wild AC rectified to DC and a 1000Ah 48 volt battery bank. (Which I would like to avoid draining/discharging beyond 30% of its capacity to ensure battery life) the remaining infrequent and very intermittent energy demand would be satisfied by my generators.
This infrequent and intermittent load comes from my workshop.
I have been thinking that it may be prudent to build a capacitor bank to handle or pick up the system slack of any inductive load start up currents such as the motor on my air compressor and table saw.
But I am not sure at this time if there is not a better/cheaper way. Your thoughts and comments would be greatly appreciated and valued I hope you have time to get back to me. Thank you for your time and attention in advance.
Kind Regards
David
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
My Reply
Hi David,
I have read your requirement and have hopefully understood it correctly.
Out of the 4 inverters, only one would be having its own frequency
generator, while others would be running by extracting the frequency from
this main inverter output, and thus all would be in sync with each other
and with this master inverters specs.
Ill try to design it and hope it works as expected and as per your
mentioned specs, however the implementation will need to be done by an
expert who should be capable of understanding the concept and modify/tweak
it to perfection wherever it might be required....otherwise succeeding
with this reasonably complex design could become extremely difficult.
I can only present the basic concept and the schematic....rest will need
to be done by the engineers from your side.
It might take me some time to complete, this since I already have many
pending requests in the Queue...Ill inform you as son as its posted
Best Regards
Swag
Email#2
My Reply
Thanks David,
Basically you want the inverters to be in sync with each other in terms of
frequency and phase, and also each one having the ability to become the
master inverter and takeover the charge, in case the previous one fails
due to some reason. Right?
Ill try to fix this with whatever knowledge I have and some common sense
and not by employing complex ICs or configurations.
Warmest Regards
Swag
Email#3
The Design
As requested by Mr. David, the proposed 4kva stackable power inverter circuits need to be in the form of 4 separate inverter circuits, which can be stacked up appropriately in sync with each other for supplying the correct amount of self-regulating power to the connected loads, depending on how these loads are switched ON and OFF.
And in case the second inveter also fails, the third inverter takes the command and plays the role of the master inverter.
The basic design for fulfilling the mentioned criteria is shown in the following diagram:
This is in fact done by integrating the the "slave" inverters through an opamp/optocoupler stage as indicated in the above design.
Initially, the master inverter#1 is switched ON, which allows the opamp 741 stage to get powered and to initialize the frequency and phase tracking of the output voltage.
Once this is initiated, the subsequent inverters are all switched ON for adding power to the mains line.
As can be seen the opamp output is connected with the timing capacitor of all the slave inverters through an opto coupler which force the slave inverters to follow the frequency and the phase angle of the master inverter.
However the interesting thing here is the latching factor of the opamp with the instantaneous phase and frequency information. This happens since all the inverters are now delivering and running at the specified frequency and phase from the master inverter, which implies if in case any of the inverters fail including the master inverter, the opamp is able to quickly track and inject the instantaneous frequency/phase info and force the existing inverters to run with this specifications, and the inverter in turn are able to sustain the feedbacks to the opamp stage to make the transitions seamless and self optimizing.
Therefore hopefully the opamp stage takes care of the first challenge of keeping all the proposed stackable inverters perfectly synchronized through a LIVE tracking of the available mains specification.
In the next part of the article well learn the synchronized PWM sinewave stage, which is the next crucial feature of the above discussed design.
The idea was requested by Mr. David. The following email conversation between him and me details the main specs of the proposed Synchronized 4kva Stackable Inverter Circuit.
Email#1
Hi Swagatam,
Firstly I wanted to say thank you for your contribution to the world at large, the information and most importantly your willingness to share your knowledge to help other people in my opinion is invaluable for many reasons.
I would like to enhance some of the circuits you have shared to suit my own purposes, unfortunately whilst I understand what is going on in the circuits I lack the creativity and knowledge to make the amendments myself.
I can generally follow circuits if they are small and I can see where they join/connect into bigger schematics. If I may I would like to try to explain what I would like to achieve, though I am under no illusion that you are a very busy person and would not like take up your precious time unnecessarily.
The final goal would be that I would like to build ( assemble the components ) of a multi-source renewable energy micro grid, using Solar PV, Windmills, and bio diesel generators.
The first step is the PV solar inverter enhancements. I would like to use your 48 volt pure sine wave inverter circuit capable of maintaining a constant 2kW 230V output, it must be capable of delivering at least 3 times this output for a very short duration.
The key modification that I want to achieve it to create a number of these inverters units to work in parallel and connected to an AC bus bar. I would like each inverter to independently and constantly sample the AC bus bar for frequency, voltage and current (load).
I will call these inverters slave units. The idea being the invert modules will be “plug and play”.
The inverter once connected to the AC bus bar would constantly sample/measure the frequency on the AC bus bar and use this information to drive the input of a 4047 IC such that its clock output can be advanced or retarded until it exactly clones the frequency on the AC bus bar once the two wave forms are synchronized the inverter will close a contactor or relay which connects the invert output stage to the AC bus bar.
In the event that the frequency on the bar or the voltage moves outside of a pre-determined tolerance the inverter module should open the relay or contactor on the output stage effectively disconnecting the inverter output stage from the AC bar to protect its self.
Additionally once connected to the AC bus bar the slave units would go to sleep or at least the output stage of the inverter would sleep while the load on the bar is less than the sum of all of the slave inverters. Imagine if you will there are 3 slave inverters attached to the AC bus bar, however the load on the bar is only 1.8kW then the other two slaves would go to sleep.
The reciprocal would also be true that if the load on the bar jumped to say 3kW one of the sleeping inverts would instantly wake (already be in sync) to supply the additionally required energy.
I imagine some large capacitors on each of the output stage would supply the energy required whilst the inverter has the very short moment whilst it wakes up. It would be preferable (only in my opinion) not to directly connect each inverter to each other but rather that they be independently autonomous.
I want to try to avoid micro controllers or the units error or fault checking each other or the units having ‘address’s’ on the system. In my mind’s eye I imagine that the first connected device on the AC bus bar would be a very stable reference inverter that is constantly connected.
This reference inverter would provide the frequency and voltage that the other slave units would use to generate their own respective outputs.
Unfortunately I can’t get my head around how you could prevent a feedback loop where the slave units would each potentially end up becoming the reference unit. Beyond the scope of this email I have some small generators I would like to connect to the AC bus bar synchronizing to the reference inverter to supply energy in the event that the load exceeds the DC max output capacity.
The overall premise is that the load presented to the AC bus bar would determine how many inverters and ultimately how many generators would either autonomously connect or disconnect to meet the demand as this would hopefully save energy or at least not waste energy.
The system being completely built of multiple modules would then be expandable/contractible as well as robust/resilient such that if anyone or perhaps two units were to fail the system would continue to function all be it at reduced capacity. I have attached a block diagram and excluded the battery charging for the time being.
I plan on charging the battery bank from the AC bus and rectifying down to 48V DC this way I can charge from the generators or the renewable energy sources, I do recognize that this is perhaps not as efficient as using DC mppt but I think what I lose in efficiency I gain in flexibility. I live a long way from town or the utility grid.
For reference there would be a minimum constant load on the AC bus bar of 2kW’s though the peak load could rise by as much as 30kW.
My plan is for the 1st 10 to 15kW to be provided by the solar PV panels and two 3kW (peak) windmills the windmills are wild AC rectified to DC and a 1000Ah 48 volt battery bank. (Which I would like to avoid draining/discharging beyond 30% of its capacity to ensure battery life) the remaining infrequent and very intermittent energy demand would be satisfied by my generators.
This infrequent and intermittent load comes from my workshop.
I have been thinking that it may be prudent to build a capacitor bank to handle or pick up the system slack of any inductive load start up currents such as the motor on my air compressor and table saw.
But I am not sure at this time if there is not a better/cheaper way. Your thoughts and comments would be greatly appreciated and valued I hope you have time to get back to me. Thank you for your time and attention in advance.
Kind Regards
David
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
My Reply
Hi David,
I have read your requirement and have hopefully understood it correctly.
Out of the 4 inverters, only one would be having its own frequency
generator, while others would be running by extracting the frequency from
this main inverter output, and thus all would be in sync with each other
and with this master inverters specs.
Ill try to design it and hope it works as expected and as per your
mentioned specs, however the implementation will need to be done by an
expert who should be capable of understanding the concept and modify/tweak
it to perfection wherever it might be required....otherwise succeeding
with this reasonably complex design could become extremely difficult.
I can only present the basic concept and the schematic....rest will need
to be done by the engineers from your side.
It might take me some time to complete, this since I already have many
pending requests in the Queue...Ill inform you as son as its posted
Best Regards
Swag
Email#2
Hi Swagatam,
Thank you so much for your very prompt response.
Thats not quite what I had in mind but certainly represents an alternative.
My thought was that each unit would have two frequency measurement sub circuits one that looks at the frequency on the AC bus bar and this unit is used to create the clock pulse for the inverter sine wave generator.
The other frequency measurement sub circuit would look at the output from the inverter sine wave generator.
There would be a comparison circuit perhaps using an opamp array that would feed back into the inverter sine wave generator clock pulse to advance the clock signal or retard the clock signal until the output from the sine wave generator exactly matched the sine wave on the AC Bar.
Once the frequency of the output stage of the inverter matched the frequency of the AC bus bar there would be an SSR that would close connecting the output stage of the inverter onto the AC bar preferably at the zero cross over point.
This way any one inverter module could fail and the system would carry on functioning. the purpose of the master inverter was that of all the inverter modules it would never go to sleep and would provide the initial AC bar frequency. however if it failed then the other units would not be affected as long as one was online
The slave units should shut down or start up as the load changes.
Your observation was correct I am not an "electronics" man I am a mechanical and electrical engineer :-) I work with big plant items like chillers and generators and compressors.
As this project progresss, and starts to become more tangible would you be wiling/open to accept a money gift? I dont have much but I could perhaps gift some money via paypal to help suport your website hosting costs.
Thankyou again.
I look forward to hearing from you.
namaste
David
My Reply
Thanks David,
Basically you want the inverters to be in sync with each other in terms of
frequency and phase, and also each one having the ability to become the
master inverter and takeover the charge, in case the previous one fails
due to some reason. Right?
Ill try to fix this with whatever knowledge I have and some common sense
and not by employing complex ICs or configurations.
Warmest Regards
Swag
Email#3
Hi Swag,
Thats it in a nut shell, with taking one additional requirement into consideration.
As the load drops the Inverters go into an eco or standby mode and as the load increases off or increases they wake to meet the demand.
I love the approach you are going with ...
Thank you so much your consideration to me is very greatly appreciated.
Namaste
Kindest Regards
David
The Design
As requested by Mr. David, the proposed 4kva stackable power inverter circuits need to be in the form of 4 separate inverter circuits, which can be stacked up appropriately in sync with each other for supplying the correct amount of self-regulating power to the connected loads, depending on how these loads are switched ON and OFF.
Synchronizing the Inverters
The main challenge here is to enable each of slave inverters to be in sync with the master inverter as long as the master inverter is operational, and in an event (although unlikely) the master inverter fails or stops working, the subsequent inverter takes over the charge and becomes the master inverter itself.
And in case the second inveter also fails, the third inverter takes the command and plays the role of the master inverter.
All the above needs to be executed without losing the control over frequency, phase and PWM even for a split second, and with a smooth transition.
In the figure above we can see a couple of identical stages, where the upper inverter#1 forms the master inverter while the lower inverter#2 the slave.
More stages in the form of inverter#3 and inverter#4 is supposed to be added to the set up in the same identical fashion by integrating these inverters with their indivudual optocoupler stages, but the opamp stage need not be repeated.
The design primarily consists of an IC 555 based oscillator and an IC 4013 flip flop circuit. The IC 555 is rigged to generate clock frequencies at the rate of 100Hz or 120Hz which is fed to the clock input of the IC 4013, which then converts it into the required 50Hz or 60Hz by alternately flipping its outputs with logic high across pin#1 and pin#2.
These alternating outputs are then used for activating the power devices and the transformer for generating the intended 220V or the 120V AC.
Now as discussed earlier the crucial issue here is to synchronize the two inverters so that these are able to run exactly in sync, with regards to frequency, phase and PWM.
Initially all the involved modules (stackable inverter circuits) are separately adjusted with precisely identical components so that their behavior are perfectly on par with each other.
However even with the precisely matched attributes, the inverters cannot be expected to run perfectly in sync unless these are tied up in some unique manner.
However even with the precisely matched attributes, the inverters cannot be expected to run perfectly in sync unless these are tied up in some unique manner.
Initially, the master inverter#1 is switched ON, which allows the opamp 741 stage to get powered and to initialize the frequency and phase tracking of the output voltage.
Once this is initiated, the subsequent inverters are all switched ON for adding power to the mains line.
As can be seen the opamp output is connected with the timing capacitor of all the slave inverters through an opto coupler which force the slave inverters to follow the frequency and the phase angle of the master inverter.
However the interesting thing here is the latching factor of the opamp with the instantaneous phase and frequency information. This happens since all the inverters are now delivering and running at the specified frequency and phase from the master inverter, which implies if in case any of the inverters fail including the master inverter, the opamp is able to quickly track and inject the instantaneous frequency/phase info and force the existing inverters to run with this specifications, and the inverter in turn are able to sustain the feedbacks to the opamp stage to make the transitions seamless and self optimizing.
Therefore hopefully the opamp stage takes care of the first challenge of keeping all the proposed stackable inverters perfectly synchronized through a LIVE tracking of the available mains specification.
In the next part of the article well learn the synchronized PWM sinewave stage, which is the next crucial feature of the above discussed design.
Available link for download
